Trinity of Zero #32

Ralph Turchiano. Definition of Zero, New. Eternalist, Infinity, Concept

The concept of zero of being nothing or just a place holder has done extraordinary damage to the collective consciousness. Primarily for the reason, of improperly seeding the perception of what is existence or not. While 1 + 0 (nothing)=1, 2-2 = ~0 (absence of something) ≠(nothing). For once something exists it is the permanent part of a set, eternally. Zero may be of greater value to what is perceived than any other number or point.
Without it, there is no perception. Therefore when zero represents the conclusion of two non-zero constants or variables, it is not the same as one variable or constant in a formula with nothing. Yet 1×0 = 0 = 0x0 = 0x∞ One Apple multiplied by zero apples ≠ Zero Apples unless in the collective consciousness zero is intended to be defined as voiding existence. Where Zero needs to be perceived as moving from one set to another, as what mostly exists is always transient between sets.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: